No Jab, No School?
I've been putting off writing this for a couple of weeks now, but the evidence is mounting and time is likely very, very short.
Taken from buzzfeednews.com: Anti-Vax Parents Upset Children Can’t Go To New York Schools After Missing New Law’s Vaccine Deadline (buzzfeednews.com)
Is “no jab, no school,” a possibility, a probability or even a certainty, here in the UK?
I’ve been putting off writing this for a couple of weeks now, because the wickedness behind such thinking is almost beyond my comprehension. I’ve spent the time trying to rationalise it, trying to see things from the viewpoint of hypochondriac parents, anxious headteachers, myopic public health workers, and/or otherwise sort through the perceptions of Joe Six-Pack. I didn’t manage that one either.
I failed. I cannot understand either the ignorance of the average man or woman, nor the illogical, and at times, totally incoherent narrative behind such “public health” measures.
I genuinely never thought that this would be a thing in my lifetime. I cannot - even now - imagine not being allowed into a school building without having proof of certain vaccinations, or negative tests from whatever ‘disease of the week’ it happens to be. However, the very notion that a child would be denied their right to an education provided by the state, over such matters, beggars belief…
Or does it? Have the warning signs been there and have I been wilfully ignoring them?
Here, I shall take you through a very small sample of the multitude of lame-stream, repeater, mockingbird, legacy, swamp-creature, government propagandist, globalist cheerleading, scum-sucking pond-life, dinosaur media. AKA The Mainstream Media, or MSM for short!
This selection of articles from the very worst kinds of presstitute, has been compiled over the past two years and only really scratches the surface. Pre-programming typically takes place over a long period of time and often it’s only in looking back - after the cataclysmic event - that the pieces of the puzzle can be put together.
I’m attempting to get us ahead of the curve on this one, as afterwards - after a situation where the British government “with a heavy heart” decides to mandate vaccination for children who attend school - it will be too late.
It is highly likely that parents of children who are withdrawn from school due to vaccination mandates, will be pursued by the authorities as ‘dangerous anti-vaxxers’ and it is certainly not beyond the realms of possibility that the state will build ‘safeguarding’ or worse ‘child protection’ cases against parents of ‘unvaxxed’ children.
Sounds a bit too crazy?
You should know that UK case law indicates that vaccination is always seen by the courts as ‘in the Best Interests’ of the child.
Indeed, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) notes, in a recent article called: Clinical ethics: consent for vaccination in children:
In a recent case, the court declined to rule on COVID-19 vaccination (since it was not at the time approved for children), but the judge noted: “it is very difficult to foresee a situation in which a vaccination against COVID-19 approved for use in children would not be endorsed by the court as being in a child’s best interests”.
I won’t explore the implications of this comment in relation to child safeguarding and/or child protection here, as that area will need at least a whole article of its own - I will publish on this unpleasant topic next Sunday.
Suffice to say that your right to choose what goes into your own body and that of your children is now under serious threat.
The Narrative FOR “No Jab, No School”
It would seem to me that the ‘No Jab = No School’ narrative has been very deliberately spun in the MSM since around the autumn of 2019, which now looks highly suspicious.
That’s not to say that ‘anti-vaxxers’ weren’t being denigrated by the legacy media PRIOR to 2019, they were. However, I would suggest that there is a marked ‘ramping-up’ of the narrative that unvaccinated children are a serious health risk, in particular in school settings.
In Ellie Hall’s BuzzFeed article from 20th September, 2019, she gleefully reports:
“Furious anti-vax parents in New York this week are posting memes and images of sad children — and have shown up in person to protest the governor — because a new law prohibiting unvaccinated children from attending school went into effect.”
This law removed “religious exemption” as a legitimate reason to have your children attend school unvaccinated.
RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION in the state of NEW YORK has been removed
The article goes on to say:
“State health officials told BuzzFeed News that 26,217 unvaccinated New York children in public schools, private schools, parochial schools, daycare centers, and prekindergarten programs claimed religious exemptions during the 2017–18 school year. New York ended religious exemptions for vaccines in June, following the worst measles outbreaks the state had seen in decades.”
That measles outbreak sure came at a heck of a good time, didn’t it! “Co-incidence” duly noted!
You will also notice that PRIVATE SCHOOLS are not exempt from this state law, in fact the only remaining exemption in New York State is as follows:
“Medical exemptions are still allowed, but a physician with a New York license must first certify “that such immunization may be detrimental to a child’s health.””
I wonder how many physicians are willing to put their medical license to practice on the line in order to provide such certification? Now, bring that thought back to our own experiences of GPs in the UK during the last 2 years. Unsettling, isn’t’ it?
Perhaps the most alarming thing about this 2019 article comes from Governor Cuomo:
“I understand freedom of religion. We all do. We respect it. I’ve heard the anti-vaxxers’ theory, but I believe both are overwhelmed by the public health risk,” New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo told reporters after signing the bill June 13.”
So, in one short paragraph from the then Governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo, he said he “understands freedom of religion,” but has then ignored it anyway by signing the bill. Notice also how he conflates - by imprecise use of language and perhaps deliberately - freedom of religion with “anti-vaxxers’ theory.”
Way to smear both people of faith and advocates for pro-choice (rather than ‘anti-vax.’)
The BuzzFeed piece - by the way, BuzzFeed was once described by President Donald Trump as “… a failing pile of garbage…” - goes on to quote one of the parents whose child couldn’t any longer go to school. Watch how the “journalist” (repeater) twists the truth:
“This little boy can’t go back to school. Why? Because our state legislature thinks we’re a bunch of ignorant pariahs,” Rita Palma, founder of the anti-vax group My Kids, My Choice…”
Number one, I note the use of sophisticated language from the alleged ‘anti-vaxxer,’ Rita Palma. It is worth noting here the clear evidence of her intellectual ability. Words such as ‘legislature,’ ‘ignorant’ and ‘pariah’ stand out as examples of her quality. Why was this not picked up and investigated by the jOuRnAlIsT, I wonder?!
Number two, notice the name of the so-called ‘anti-vax group’ - it’s called: “My Kids, My CHOICE.” Uhm… is this not, therefore a pro-choice group? The clue is in the title, is it not?
So, there you have it, as early as September 2019, we have slurs from the ‘failing pile of garbage’ media against those who are pro-choice regarding medical interventions (vaccines) and not only slurs, but also legislation that prevents unvaccinated children from going to any schools in what I would have considered to be a sensible, sophisticated, and mature democracy. This is New York, not outer Mongolia (with respect to Mongolia… thinking about it, perhaps they have a more logical policy!)
I say ‘logical’ as why would an unvaccinated child be dangerous to a vaccinated one if the vaccines work?
They never answer that one, do they? Always some BS about ‘herd-immunity’ which isn’t actually achieved through vaccination, (despite the WHO definition of ‘herd-immunity’ being very recently re-written), but is achieved through a significant number of the population getting and surviving the disease.
The ‘unvaccinated being seen as a danger’ narrative isn’t only an American ‘disease’
Canadian presstitutes were also “at it,” and they significantly further the narrative. Here is a selection of the most egregious and unfounded claims by this newspaper:
Unvaccinated people are definitely causing these outbreaks
The unvaccinated are indeed killing innocent people who tried to protect themselves
Without immunization, preventable diseases could absolutely surge back to 1930s levels
The damage from a single unvaccinated child can be overwhelming
Vaccine-injured children aren’t a myth, but the risk is overwhelmingly outweighed by the benefits
These 5 claims cannot possibly be substantiated. Even as a lay-person, in the field of medicine, I can destroy these lazy, slovenly claims from the swamp-dwelling dinosaur media.
It can almost NEVER be proven who caught what from whom! Lawyers are well aware of the improbability of finding “patient zero” - the term given to the originator of the outbreak. If this were possible then a huge number of lawsuits would be filed every year attempting to sue for damages from ‘disease spreaders.’ According to US lawyers there is a dearth of such cases.
Following on from above, it cannot be proven that it is the unvaccinated that are spreading the disease. In addition, it should be noted that 70% of global Polio cases are FROM BILL GATES’ VACCINE. Yes, you read that correctly, the vaccine is the root cause of 70% of the world’s Polio problems. Robert F. Kennedy Jnr. has done some wonderful work on this via his website: Children's Health Defense
No one can possibly know whether or not “preventable diseases” could surge back to 1930s levels, indeed, diseases like Scarlet Fever, disappeared WITHOUT a vaccine ever being successfully produced for it and that wasn’t through lack of pHARMa trying!
See point number 1.
This is the pernicious one, this arrogant, shady ‘funny business’ with words. “…the risk is overwhelmingly outweighed by the benefits,” tell that to the parents of the child who died from the vaccine. Did the benefits outweigh the risk in that case? What about the child who suffers permanent disability from vaccination, was that worth it too? Worth it to THAT child and to THOSE parents? I don’t think so.
It is my sincere belief that if parents were sat down, in a low-stress environment and properly taken through ALL of the possible side-effects of all vaccinations, up to and including death, AND if the truth about SIDS and SADS was on the table, then the majority of parents would not risk their own flesh and blood.
The medical establishment, with their weasel-words, always make it sound as though there is no risk at all to YOUR child. Disgusting. If medical professionals are so confident in these medical products, then why not tell the truth and give PROPER INFORMED CONSENT?
I’m sorry to say it gets worse!
Link: https://www.health.com/condition/vaccines/world-health-organization-anti-vaxxer-global-threat
I like this one, as it means pro informed consent groups and pro-choice groups have been gaining traction! Good work!
On the other hand, it means we are being set up as a TOP THREAT TO GLOBAL HEALTH, which means you’re a bioweapon now!
Whilst I hope you appreciate my sense of humour; I am not advocating that anyone should take this lightly. The guttersnipe MSM are ‘othering’ us, and you are not out of order comparing this to how Hitler ‘othered’ the disabled, the gypsies and the Jews. Othering is very much a part of the road to genocide, because before men will willingly kill other men from their own country, you need to make it “acceptable,” that is to paint one group as sub-human or animal-like - you get the idea.
Interestingly, when I attempted to click the link from this article to the WHO article that they were quoting, I got this:
https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019
Those of you who do your research, will be no stranger to this kind of shenanigans! Fear not, I used the WAYBACK MACHINE, which is absolutely awesome!!!
This amazing web archive, aka the “Wayback Machine,” takes photographs of websites and records the day, date, and time the snapshot was taken. This is how we are often able to catch institutions re-writing history, and even changing the definition of words!
Sound a bit Orwellian to you?
That’s because it is. Large organizations often ‘disappear’ information ‘down the memory hole,’ but thanks to this awesome website, we can at least catch them in the act some of the time.
**If you don’t know how THE WAYBACK MACHINE works, watch out for ‘A BEGINNER’S GUIDE TO RESEARCH IN THE AGE OF THE MEMORY HOLE!’ I’ll be releasing this later in the term to assist those of you teaching “History” to teenagers!
***It also gets you behind some paywalls so that you don’t have to pay to read the swamp-media! :D
The article is well-worth reading in full and “Vaccine Hesitancy” is indeed listed, however I think there may be another reason why this page is no longer easy to find/possible to find, on the WHO website.
This article says:
“Here are 10 of the many issues that will demand attention from WHO and health partners in 2019.”
Notice the certainty - “will.”
I submit that this section is perhaps the reason this article was deleted/moved without a redirecting link:
I also note the masks in this photograph - that certainly wasn’t a thing in The West in 2019 and although this picture looks like it originates from a culture outside of the The West, it is well-known that facemasks are next to useless outside of pharmaceutical settings. This is evidently an ‘in the home setting.’ So why the masks? Pre-programming?
Here is a link to a CDC meta-study published in May 2020 covering all relevant medical studies from the years 1946 - 2018 with regard to facemasks:
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/pdfs/19-0994.pdf
Here are another 3 pre-programming headlines from 2020 and 2021:
Key section:
“We just can’t say that it’s safe to be unvaccinated. It’s not safe for the child whose parents choose not to vaccinate—and it’s really not safe for the infants or people with immune problems who cannot be vaccinated, who need vaccinated people around them to keep them well.”
Notice the ‘safety, safety, safety’ drum being beaten!
“Fur Ihre Sicherheit,” or “for your safety” was how the Nazi’s put it. Just saying.
Key points (direct quotes):
A new survey reports that half of pediatric offices and one-third of pediatricians won’t treat families who refuse to have their children vaccinated.
The doctors say their policy is to protect other families who come to their offices.
Some pediatricians who keep unvaccinated families as clients say they do so in hopes of convincing the parents to have their children immunized.
Or, TLDR: “No Jab, No Doc!”
Is that even ethical? HOW does this one get around the Hippocratic Oath and all that?
Key quotes:
Asked whether a “no jab, no school” policy was being considered, Ms Ellery said: “We’ve got to work our way through the health advice.”
“If that’s what the health advice is, then that’s what Western Australia would do, but that’s not what the health advice is right now,” she added.
And to think this is the slightly less bonkers part of Australia!
NO JAB, NO SCHOOL GATHERS PACE…
When you add to this the unvaccinated, unmasked, and untested teaching assistant that was forcibly removed from her classroom in Israel, the student from New Jersey who was banned from University for being unvaxxed - even though ALL his classes were ONLINE - and then the insane and markedly unsubstantiated claims from The Guardian that “UK parents mostly welcome 12-15s getting Covid jabs,” you can see that evidence, (or rather propaganda thinly disguised as evidence), from all over the world is stacking up against the likelihood of unvaccinated students being allowed into schools.
I also note the increase in frequency of these articles, in particular, over the last 4 weeks. All of the following articles mentioned in the paragraph above and linked below were published in September 2021.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/anti-vaxxer-teacher-forcibly-removed-from-kindergarten-after-refusing-virus-test/
https://nypost.com/2021/09/07/rutgers-bars-unvaccinated-student-from-attending-virtual-classes/
The last article, (link above), from The Guardian is most blatant in its banging of the agenda’s doom-laden drum. It doesn’t cite any polls, nor any data from the likes of the ONS or Ipsos MORI, none at all. Instead, their ‘majority of parents’ claim is based on 5 parents’ views. 5 is obviously not statistically significant. My bottom set year 9s know that!
I encourage you to read that whole despicable piece of jOuRnAlIsM for yourself. Notice how it is laced with ‘safety’ and ‘security’ once more.
CONCLUSION
I began by asking the question: Is “no jab, no school,” a possibility, a probability or even a certainty, here in the UK?
Based on the evidence collated to date, it is at least a probability, and I am strongly leaning towards a certainty, in the UK.
If I had to make a bet, I would say that “no jab, no school” will be a reality in the UK in the very near future.
Once the bodies begin piling up this winter, and they of course will be labelled “Covid,” no matter what, then “Covid Karen” will be lobbying the government, the schools, the teaching unions…
I cannot see unvaccinated children being allowed into schools and if they are, I expect they will at least be segregated from the vaccinated children.
This is of course amoral, illogical, and an all-out attempt at vaccine coercion.
But the writing is on the wall.
Final thought: What happens if a vaccinated child dies “of Covid” and your son/daughter is the only one in the class who remains unvaccinated? I know it proves nothing, but what do you think the end result will be for you, but most of all for your son/daughter.
Read - Think - Act
Sarah Plumley
Thinker-Teacher-Truther
PS. If you haven’t signed up for one of the LIVE Parent Teacher WEBINARS next week, then click here now: https://sarahplumley.substack.com/p/live-parent-teacher-training
Very much looking forward to see you all there!